Test-Exhibition: Part 2 Ohannes Kurkdjian Surabaya

Ohannes Kurkdjian

Part 2: Surabaya

Exhibit curated by Joseph E. Malikian
Photograph on the cover of this exhibit by Ohannes Kurkdjian 


Volcanic eruption in East Java by Kurkdjian Studio, ca. 1900. (Malikian Collection)

Ohannes Kurkdjian taken in his studio in Surabaya, East Java, ca. 1900.
(in 'Photo-Recorder of Ruins,' Armenian Art, 3-4, 2008)

Ohannes Kurkdjian taken in his studio in Surabaya, East Java, ca. 1900.(in 'Photo-Recorder of Ruins,' Armenian Art, 3-4, 2008)

Driven by wanderlust, in 1885 Ohannes Kurkdjian (1851-1903) left his past life in the Ottoman and Russian Empires for new adventures in the colonial Dutch East Indies. The publication of his stereoscopic views of the Armenian Ruins of Ani, which resulted in accusations of sedition and the threat of incarceration by the Russian authorities, prompted Kurkdjian to escape Yerevan for Vienna in 1881. In search of a new life with promising prospects for work, he embarked on the long journey from Vienna to Southeast Asia in 1885.

Upon his arrival, Kurkdjian spent a brief period of time in Singapore. In 1886, he settled in Surabaya, a port town on the east end of Java, Indonesia. Kurkdjian immersed himself within a community that became a hub for Armenians who had immigrated to the Dutch East Indies.

Willemskade, Surabaya, a historical landmark now known as Jembatan Merah Street by Kurkdjian Studio, ca. 1900. (Malikian Collection)

Willemskade, Surabaya, a historical landmark now known as
Jembatan Merah Street by Kurkdjian Studio, ca. 1900. (Malikian Collection)

Willemskade, Surabaya, a historical landmark now known as
Jembatan Merah Street by Kurkdjian Studio, ca. 1900. (Malikian Collection)

The Chinese Church in Surabaya by Kurkdjian Studio, ca. 1900.
(Malikian Collection)

Chinese section in Surabaya by Kurkdjian Studio, ca. 1900.
(Malikian Collection)

Train station in Surabaya by Kurkdjian Studio, ca. 1900.
(Malikian Collection)

A residential section in Surabaya by Kurkdjian Studio, ca. 1900.
(Malikian Collection)

A residential home in Surabaya by Kurkdjian Studio, ca. 1900.
(Malikian Collection)

Hotel Oranje now known as Hotel Majapahit founded by the Armenian Sarkies Brothers known for creating a chain of luxury hotels. Kurkdjian Studio, ca. 1910. (Malikian Collection)

Hotel Oranje now known as Hotel Majapahit founded by the Armenian Sarkies Brothers known for creating a chain of luxury hotels. Kurkdjian Studio, ca. 1910. (Malikian Collection)

Horizontal Swipe or Scroll >

The first significant wave of Armenians, who were mostly merchants from Isfahan, Persia and settlements in India, traveled to Batavia (Jakarta), Indonesia at the end of the eighteenth century. The Armenians established several prominent commercial houses engaged in trade with overseas markets.1 In the second half of the nineteenth century, the center of the Armenian community in the Dutch East Indies gradually moved from Batavia (Western Java) to Surabaya (Eastern Java). On January 6, 1880, the Armenian community was formally recognized as an incorporated society by the Dutch government.2 Surabaya became the most important ‘Armenian city’ in the Dutch East Indies around the turn of the twentieth century.3 With Kurkdjian’s “entrepreneurial zeal,” he found success as a commercial and documentary photographer within this milieu of indigenous and Western inhabitants.4

In 1890, Kurkdjian established a studio in the Bultzingslowen Square of Surabaya. As his atelier continued to grow, in 1897 Kurkdjian recruited a British assistant, G.P. Lewis (1875-1926), who took over the reins of the studio upon Kurkdjian’s passing in 1903. The studio eventually moved to larger quarters and employed 30 people. It also served as the training grounds for budding photographers, such as Thilly Weissenborn (1883-1964) who became one of the first female photographers to launch a thriving atelier in West Java.

  • In the Kurkdjian Studio, Surabaya, ca. 1900. (Alamy stock photos)

Kurkdjian’s photographic output ranged from artistically composed portraiture of Europeans residing in Surabaya to ethnographic studies of Javanese inhabitants. Outside of the studio, his documentary images consisted of people at work in plantations, factories and laboratories, as well as imagery of exotic Javanese landscapes, tropical forests, beaches and volcanoes. Although Java is a small island, its geography has made it prone to recurrent active volcanoes. Kurkdjian and his assistants captured many of these large and small volcanic eruptions. Following the eruption of Mount Kelud on May 23, 1901, Kurkdjian was invited by the Dutch Government on June 6, 1901 to photograph the aftermath of this striking explosive eruption.5 This commissioned photographic assignment, as noted by Galstyan, led to an exhibition which was praised in De Locomotief for bringing the viewer “into the wild world of grandeur, of feeling alone, of becoming a small person facing infinite creation.”6 7

  • Volcanic eruption in East Java by Kurkdjian Studio, ca. 1900. (Malikian Collection)

“These images of volcanic eruptions brought the viewer into the wild world of grandeur, of feeling alone, of becoming a small person facing infinite creation.”

  • Volcanic eruption in East Java by Kurkdjian Studio, ca. 1900. (Malikian Collection)

Kurkdjian’s oeuvre incorporated elements of photojournalism, such as the documentation of Queen Wilhelmina’s visit to Java on August 31, 1898. To commemorate the Queen’s visit, he produced an album which incorporated “views of the parade preparations, the visit itself and much of the pomp and circumstances that surrounded it.”8 This highly decorative and elaborate album was presented to the Queen. In 1902, she bestowed upon Kurkdjian the Royal Warrant which acknowledged his photographic studies of Indonesia during Dutch colonial rule.

Kurkdjian’s strong nationalistic sentiments to liberate his Armenian compatriots suffering under Ottoman and Russian misrule did not cease upon his departure from Yerevan. With fellow Armenians in Surabaya, he formed the Armenian Encouraging Union whose mission was to promote the liberation of Western Armenians facing oppression and persecution by the Ottoman and Russian authorities. Kurkdjian’s passionate quest to assist from afar his people “brought honor and glory to both himself and his nation.”9

Upon Kurkdjian’s passing in 1903, G.P. Lewis ran the studio, and in 1904 it became “O. Kurkdjian & Co., a Company for the Exploitation of the Photographic Atelier Kurkdjian.” In 1915, the Company was taken over by the pharmaceutical importers Mieling & Co.10 Under the Kurkdjian name, the studio continued to produce portraits and ethnographic studies of Indonesian people and their landscapes until it closed in 1936. However, with the emergence of amateur photographers resulting in the gradual demise of professional photographic ateliers, the studio was compelled to expand its services to include the sale of photographic equipment, and the development, printing, and enlargement of photographs for new users of cameras. 11

Kurkdjian Studio in Surabaya. (Courtesy of Tropenmuseum, National Museum of World Cultures)

Kurkdjian Studio Stamp, ca. 1900. (Malikian Collection)

Kurkdjian Studio Stamp, ca. 1900. (Malikian Collection)

Kurkdjian Studio Stamp, ca. 1910. (Malikian Collection)

Ohannes Kurkdjian on the edge of the Sand Sea (Lautan Pasir) in the Tengger Mountains, ca. 1900. (Alamy stock photos)

Ohannes Kurkdjian and his Legacy

Ohannes Kurkdjian is regarded as one of the pioneers of Armenian photography who was passionate about his craft. His skills and prolific photographic oeuvre had its roots in his native country of Armenia which he brought to his newfound home in the Dutch East Indies. Kurkdjian recognized the potential for the camera’s lens to capture a vast array of subject matter that documented important remnants of visual culture and significant moments in history. Although his photographic study of the “Armenian Ruins of Ani” was met with controversy by the Russian authorities, for Armenians these images became Kurkdjian’s crown achievement and a testament to Armenia’s past glory. Kochar characterized Kurkdjian as “the founder and originator of historical monuments and photo-recording in the Armenian reality.”12

“Photographs of the Dutch East Indies carry a strong connection to Netherlands colonialism which means that they are today not just regarded ambivalently by photographic historians, but are frequently overlooked.”

Kurkdjian’s ethnographic images of native Indonesians and their landscapes, which were promoted and reproduced by agencies affiliated with the Dutch East Indies, are historical documents that chronicled a chapter from Indonesia’s distant past. However, these photographs are representative of a controversial era connected to Dutch colonialism—a period in history which is now fraught with harsh criticism and rejection. As such, how is one to study and interpret Kurkdjian’s images of a colonized people and their milieu, and what historical value do they hold? Maxwell notes that photography produced during the era of the Dutch East Indies carry “a strong connection to Netherlands colonialism which means that they are today not just regarded ambivalently by photographic historians, but are frequently overlooked.”13 With a revision of the past, Kurkdjian’s work may be subject to scrutiny, criticism, and omission. However, in spite of the controversies surrounding his oeuvre, he remains an important figure in the history of Armenian photography.

  • A plantation in Surabaya by Kurkdjian Studio, ca. 1900. (Malikian Collection)

References

  1. “The Armenian Minority in the Dutch East Indies,” https://hetq.am/article/11609
  2. Armenians in Indonesia,” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Armenians_in_Indonesia
  3. “The Armenian Minority in the Dutch East Indies,” https://hetq.am/article/11609
  4. Vigen Galstyan, “Ohannes Kurkdjian’s Duality,”   https://www.academia.edu/42376454/Ohannes_Kurkdjians_Duality
  5. Heidi Hinzler, “Onnes Kurkdjian, Viewmaker and Entrepreneur,” https://www.asia-pacific-photography.com/towardindependence/kurkdjian
  6. Vigen Galstyan, “Ohannes Kurkdjian’s Duality,”  https://www.academia.edu/42376454/Ohannes_Kurkdjians_Duality
  1.  “Fotogratleen van de Kloet,” review in De Locomotief, no. 50, 17 August, 1901, p. 187, translation by Mark Hillis.
  2. Heidi Hinzler, “Onnes Kurkdjian, Viewmaker and Entrepreneur,” https://www.asia-pacific-photography.com/towardindependence/kurkdjian
  3. Ani Kirakosyan, “Photo-Recorder of Ruins,” in Armenian Art, 3-4, 2008, pp. 25-26.
  4. Heidi Hinzler, “Onnes Kurkdjian, Viewmaker and Entrepreneur,” https://www.asia-pacific-photography.com/towardindependence/kurkdjian
  5. Ibid., 2
  6. Vahan Kochar, Hay Lusankarichner (in Armenian), self-published, 2007, pp. 414-412.
  7. Anne Maxwell, “Thilly Weisenborn: Photographer of the Netherlands East Indies,” https://doi.org/10.1080/03087298.2021.1900682

Acknowledgments

This exhibit extends its appreciation to art historian Vigen Galstyan for his research on Ohannes Kurkdjian.

No part of this exhibition may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without prior written permission of Joseph E. Malikian and supporting resources used in this exhibit.

Related Digital Exhibition
Ohannes Kurkdjian Part 1: The Ruins of Ani